FTAlphaville: China gets …
EconBizFin: Of 300 big Po…
nicholasdunbar: Goldman s…
EconBizFin: Some $130 bil…
djfxtrader: Register for …
ProSyn: Most commented on…
ZipperTheory: this almost…
LukasSustala: Breaking Do…
ezraklein: Must-read NYT …
groditi: Sov defaults are…
EconBizFin: Entrepreneurs…
GSElevator: I actually wr…
longreads: Announcing: Ou…
bondvigilantes: New post:…
Oil to Natural Gas Ratio 1990 to 2012
Natural gas is trading at 2 handle last checked at $2.67BTU even as crude nearing $100.What is historic relationship between crude oil and natural gas? I pulled some data from Reuters, both are Nymex front month future contract from 1990 onwards. Crude oil data goes to 1986, but Natural Gas only started in 1990.

Interestingly the relationship between oil and gas since 1990 after the initial spike traded between 5 and 15 from 1992 to 2009. Then it has been on a bull run to just under 40 right now. The current ratio is the highest in 20 years, and this can be largely attributed to the Shale Gas boom underway in the US. Presenting the data in this way, it highlights the impact of the shale gas flooding onto the continental market impact on the price.
Due to infrastructure constraints and historical reluctance to export natural gas, all the gas pumped out of the earth have to be consumed domestically. Even with LNG prices in the teens in Europe and high single digit in Asia, the largest growth market there is little means for US producers to take advantage of the situation. One means of consuming the excess supply could be increase the use of natural gas in base load power.
Bullish case for Natural Gas?

In the short term, even with the warmer than expected winter period which has limited natural gas on the upside. Given the seasonal reduction in the natural gas inventories in the short term, along with the predictable decrease in production from high cost producers, as most shale gas drilled recently were attributed to control lease agreement’s use or lose it clause. The downside seems limited from here.
In the medium term, the opening of the exports from the construction of LNG export terminals which the US has evidently lacked will ensure that it can arbitrage the high prices seen around the world. The low cost production in the US allows us to compete from a lower cost base than Australia LNG trains in Aisa. Since gas is cleaner than coal, with China over reliance on coal with the negative externalities, it would be attractive for US producers to push towards this market than any other. However other emerging markets are ripe for the picking, better late than never.
Domestically, the decline in conventional gas production and its replacement with shale gas will maintain the current strong production flow levels. This will ensure that prices will remain lower than historic levels and attractive for power generators to convert and build natural gas plans relative to other sources. However this is predicated upon a constructive regulatory environment to encourage such developments. With the current election year and controversy over fracking extraction method, I would not expect any positive developments in this area until after the 2012 election. Then with a 2 -3 years lead time for planning and construction.

